The Camp Guy's Blog

The Camp Guy's blog is where you can find worthwhile opinions on the world of sports. I may take the side of the idealists, but hey, that's who I am, an idealist and a purist. You can learn a lot about our society by observing the things we celebrate the most... and what do we celebrate more than our athletes? I do weekly NFL picks, articles on the NBA, commentary on the lives of the Pros, and more. Check in with me each week as I update you on the world of sports as you know it...

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Monkey = Off Back

What a game!! I was watching at my buddy's house and we Tivo'd the game so we could watch it without commercials. We had about a 45 minute delay going into the game, and we started to catch up to real-time near halftime. At that point, the Pat's were up 21-6. Anyhow, at half-time we went outside to throw the football around, came back in and the Tivo malfunctioned!! We spent the next 5 minutes trying to fix it, realized it was beyond repair, and then just decided to give up & watch it in real time. We turn on 'real-time TV' and it's 21-21. I was floored. Couldn't believe it. Now THIS was the game I was hoping for....

A note to Pats fans: Going down the stretch I thought there were some bad calls in favor of the Colts (non-call on a blatant PI and a terrible roughing the passer call). But that doesn't really matter, and in the grand scheme of things, no one (except maybe you Pats fans) will remember that stuff.

Peyton Manning won. He won in dramatic, come from behind fashion and he beat the team that has repeatedly put him out of the playoffs in the past. Kinda reminded me of a Steve Young moment. I thought he played a very composed game, ran the no-huddle really well and made some big throws when his team really needed him. It was great to watch. This game alone puts Peyton into my top 10 QB list. His stats & regular season record are super impressive, but they weren't enough for me. I tend to weigh 'big game performances' much higher than other people. It means a lot that he was able to win in such a tough, gutsy way. What a performance!!!

I know Peyton still has to win the Super Bowl on Feb. 4th. However, it almost seems as if this game was the one that mattered the most. Maybe it's because Peyton has lost the AFC Championship game before. I hope he wins. Go Colts!

Below is an excerpt from a previous entry about Peyton's crummy playoff past, written after last year's loss to Pittsburgh...

"To be honest, I still think he'll win the Super Bowl, eventually. He's good enough that I feel like EVENTUALLY, the cards will fall in his favor. But at this point, Manning has made a name for himself as a choker. To reverse his reputation, Manning would have to win the Super Bowl in a come-from-behind, only man for the job, ice water in his veins way. Anything less than a spectacular and heroic performance will leave doubt in the minds of everyone who has ever watched him play. Including me. Until that happens, Peyton Manning is NOT one of the best 15 or so QBs of all-time. All those haters who think Manning is a better QB than Brady are idiots. Those that say he is an all-time great are simply wrong and care more about stats and games against the Texans than they should."

I think that was a very honest and accurate assessment at the time. I stand by it. And I'm glad to see that Peyton's had the type of performance that makes me believe he's the kind of winner that can be mentioned with some of the greats. He's no Tom Brady, but we can get into that at a later date.... :)


The Camp Guy

Friday, October 13, 2006

Week 6 Picks...

Rams over Seahawks
Philly over Saints
Skins over Titans
Panthers over Ravens
Bills over Lions
Falcons over Giants
Cowboys over Texans
Cincy over Bucs
Jets over Dolphins
Chargers over Niners
Steelers over Chiefs
Broncos over Raiders
Bears over Cards

-The Camp Guy

Monday, October 09, 2006

Hallelujah!!!

What a nail-biter! The Eagles pulled it off though, 38-24 and thankfully the rent-a-cops they hired in Philly weren't needed either (way to go Philly fans!).... I watched the game in LA (I was visiting my friend, Jason Fehon, who is a famous DJ in Philadelphia on 93.3 WMMR, check him out) and happened to be at the same bar as John Salley of The Best Damn Sports Show...Period. I think he was rooting for the Cowboys though, so I didn't talk to him. I will say this though, if you're ever on Sunset Blvd and you're looking for a place to watch the game, go to the Saddle Back Bar & Grill, it's awesome. Great service, great people, tons of TVs and good food. I couldn't imagine a better atmosphere for sitting back and watching T.O. wet the bed on national TV....

-The Camp Guy

Friday, October 06, 2006

Week 5 Picks - and then some...

Saints over Bucs
Rams over Packers
Giants over Skins
Colts over Titans by a ton.
Bears over Bills by a ton.
Panthers over Browns
Patriots over Dolphins
Vikings over Lions
Niners over Raiders (go EJ!)
Jags over Jets
KC over Cards
Steelers over Bolts
Ravens over Broncos

and

Eagles over Dallas. On a personal note, this game is going to be unreal. Ticket prices in Philly are $100 dollars more than usual, topping out at playoff price levels. People are sitting at home as I type this filling perscription bottles with C batteries and pills. Nothing will surprise me this weekend. Roits, sniper rifles, a gang of 700 level brutes givine TO a wedgie... nothing. And not that I condone such action, but I can't wait!!! Go Birds!

-The Camp Guy

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Blah, Blah, Sports, Blah, Sports, Blah, Blah

There are a couple things worth noting this week.

1) It looks like Corey Simon, the Colts star D-Tackle, is going to miss the rest of the NFL season with an undisclosed disease that is unrelated to football. The good news out of Colts-land is that the disease is not life threatening and they are optimistic about his return to the team next season. We here at SportsCamper.com send our best wishes to Simon, a former Eagles star, who is a likeable player and a fantastic teammate from all reports.

2) Gratuitous Ivy League tidbit: At my alma mater, Quarterback Matt Polhemus and running back Mike McLeod were arrested for fighting and disturbing the peace after, presumably, getting wasted at Toad's Nightclub. What a bunch of knuckleheads. Of course I'd be in a fighting mood, too, if I had to play under the tutelage of Jack Siedlecki (only Yale coach EVER to lose 5 straight games to Harvard). Nice work, Jack. Keep it up. Tell Chef I said hi.

3) Albert Haynesworth of the Titans, stomped on Cowboys' Andre Gurode's face. Between plays. While he wasn't wearing a helmt. While he was laying on the ground.

Are you kidding me?

This is ridiculous. I'm glad he got a 5 game suspension and if you ask me, it should have been an 8 game suspension. What he did is assault. He left Gurode in need a 30 stitches and unable to practice as of today. What goes on between the whistles is one thing. Visciously attacking someone while he's lying on the ground, helpless, is an entirely different matter. Thankfully, Haynesworth has apologized to Gurode, and publicly stated he will not appeal the suspension.

4) David Stern, the commissioner of the NBA is actually thinking about going forward with an all-Europe division of the NBA - with teams in cities such as Madrid, London, Moscow, Berlin and Cologne. Wow. My question is, do all the players in that league have grow disgusting facial hair like Pau Gasol, Dirk Nowitski and Vlade Divac by rule? Has Gilette spread to Europe yet?


Ok, that's it. Tomorrow, get ready for the NFL picks of the week.

-The Camp Guy

Friday, September 29, 2006

Week 4 Picks

Atlanta over Arizona
Dallas over Tennessee
Indy over J-E-T-S
Houston over Miami
Buffalo over Minnesota
Carolina over New Orleans
Baltimore over San Diego
KC over San Fran
St Louis over Detroit
Cleveland over Oakland
Jacksonville over Skins
Cincy over New England
Chicago over Seattle
Philly over Green Bay

Fooooootball!!!

-The Camp Guy

Thursday, September 28, 2006

A Few Words About USA Basketball

1. I'm not all that discouraged by our 3rd place showing at the World Championships. We have a million things working against us including the rules, the refs, the court, the schedule and the expectations.

2. I liked the make-up of the team, including Coach K. I thought they played with pretty good chemistry. I liked the way the young guys took pride in their performance. This was a big step up from the last group.

3. I think the team defense was great at times, but needed work. There were some parts of the international game that clearly exposed some of the bad defensive habits out players had. Kirk Hinrich, though, was awesome.

4. I still think they need to bring on another pure shooter. Ray Allen, Michael Redd, Raja Bell, etc.

5. I still think we need Tim Duncan.

6. Americans need to stop freaking out and the rest of the world needs to calm down a bit, too. The best basketball players in the world are Americans. It's really not even close. However, it's a team game and it takes a while to develop a team, especially if you have to re-learn a whole new set of rules, regulations, etc. This same basic crew is going to play in the Olympics, right?

7. Americans also need to realize that the international game is a far cry from the NBA game. If Dwyane Wade and Lebron were playing within international rules their whole life, they'd be winning the gold medal by 40 points.

which brings me to my final point...

8. Why are there two types of basketball? Imagine if the whole world decided to invite an NFL all-star team to join a huge Rugby tournament. And imagine the NFL had to throw a team together in a month and be ready to play against teams who had been practicing together for years... Of course the NFL players would get spanked. Sure the analogy is a bit off, and not that it would/could ever happen, but how ridiculous would that be? Why isn't everyone playing by the same rules? Here's one vote for either everyone playing by the international rules (far more interesting game to watch) or by the NBA rules, but not both.

Maybe the international teams would agree to play by NBA rules, but have the Americans only play with 4 players. I'm sure that would go over just as well... :)

For another look at what to do with Team USA, check out this link...
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=klosterman/060907


- The Camp Guy

The T.O. Saga Continues

So, by now we've all heard about T.O.'s alleged suicide attempt/alleged pain killer over-dose/alleged allergic reaction/bout with depression/25 million reasons to be alive....

Ugh.

I gotta say this, though. T.O. is obviously missing some vital human instincts. His idea of what 'should' happen vs. what actually makes sense are almost always at odds. But it's not that surprising.

I was watching 'Outside The Lines' on ESPN2 the other night, and they had a 1 hour program on T.O.'s childhood, adolescent life and college maturation. Having watched it, there is no doubt in my mind that his problems stem from a complete lack of stable family life. T.O.'s father lived across the street from him, but Owens didn't meet him until he was 12 years old. He wasn't allowed to go out and play with the other kids. He never really played sports. He was ridiculed and bullied at school. His life was a self-esteem nightmare.

It might seem like I'm making excuses for T.O., but I'm not. Lots of people live a rough life and still turn out great. I just think it's very important that we look at this guy with realistic eyes. As a Philadelphia fan, T.O. is my least favorite professional athlete. But he's not my least favorite human being. He's obviously got a very sensitive, very impressionable, very awkward side to him and he clearly lets his insecurities get in the way of what could have been an flawless career. We need to look at a guy like T.O. and learn the right lessons. We have to realize that T.O. is not just an independent character, acting this way for no reason. He's been influenced by different things his entire life. Some good things, but MANY, MANY negative things. As coaches, parents, players and observers, we must realize that there are plenty of T.O.'s out there and it's our job to stem the insecurities, selfishness and hurt as much as we can. Sports are supposed to be a metaphor for life. Somewhere along the line, the Drew Rosenhauses of the world painted a poor picture of what life is meant to be, and T.O. chose to go with it. "25 million reasons to be alive"... that quote right there shows without a shadow of a doubt that T.O. is surrounded by people who have NO idea what he needs.

Again, I'm not making excuses for him. T.O. had a rough life. Boo-hoo. HE still has to take responsibility for his decisions, and he MUST realize the negative impact that he is having on his future, his family, his teammates and his health. He must be as willing to work on his character as he is on his body. That is his responsibility. For every individual, life is about making the choices that get us out of the tough spots, not making the excuses that keep us there. People like Andy Reid, Bill Parcells, Steve Young, Steve Mariucci, Donovan McNabb and Jeff Garcia all know that.... which is why they all seem to be at odds with T.O.

OUR responsibility is to learn from him. Find a way to curb the "ego-maniac in training" that plays on your 6th grade basketball team. Take those loner athletes under your wing. Find a way to make a difference to those kids who might not have the same exposure to great role models. It may not make a difference every time, but in the long haul, the T.O.'s of tomorrow will be fewer and further between if our society learns from him. If we don't learn, I suspect that this sideshow will only repeat itself over and over and over....

I hope T.O. is able to adjust, but I sincerely doubt it will happen anytime soon. He's headed down the same road Mike Tyson went down... I just hope that he can get out of the spotlight and find some peace in the near future.

Just not before week 5. :) Go Eagles!


-The Camp Guy

Thursday, September 07, 2006

WEEK ONE PICKS

Miami over Pittsburgh
Philly over Houston
NE over Buffalo
Denver over St. Louis
Tampa over Baltimore
Tennessee over NYJ
Seattle over Detroit
New Orleans over Cleveland
Cincy over KC
Carolina over ATL
Jax over Dallas
Chicago over Green Bay
Arizona over SF
Indy over NYG
Minnesota over Washington
San Diego over Oakland

gotta go, it's gametime....


The Camp Guy

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

NFL Predictions

I was reading on ESPN.com today and the so-called experts made their picks for division, conference and Super Bowl winners. They also predicted Coach of the Year, MVP, Rookie of the year awards, etc. Suffice it to say that their picks were less than impressive. I'd especially like to 'call out' Michael Smith (for picking the 'Skins and Lions to win their divisions), Joe Theismann (for picking the 'Skins and Ravens to win their divisions) and Merrill Hoge (for being a total putz).

With that said, I'd like to go on record with my All-Important Pre-Season Predictions for the 2006 NFL season....

AFC East: Patriots
AFC North: Bengals
AFC South: Colts
AFC West: Broncos
AFC WildCards: Chiefs, Steelers

NFC West: Seahawks
NFC South: Panthers
NFC North: Bears
NFC East: Eagles
NFC WildCards: Cowboys, Cardinals

AFC Champ: Bengals
NFC Champ: Panthers

Super Bowl Champ: Panthers

Coach of the Year: Andy Reid
NFL MVP: Carson Palmer
Defensive Player of the Year: Jeremiah Trotter
Offensive Player of the Year: Larry Johnson
Defensive Rookie of the Year: Broderick Bunkley
Offensive Rookie of the Year: Reggie Bush

Also, just so no one gets the wrong impression, I have a lot of respect for Mike Golic, Michael Clayton and Len Pasquarelli, who also made picks. Rational ones at that. :)

Happy NFL season my friends.... enjoy.


-The Camp Guy

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

FANTASY PREVIEW

OK, so I'm in preparation mode for my 2006 Fantasy seasons. Notice I said seasons, not season. I'm in 4 different leagues. It's embarassing, I'm an addict, but I have no excuses for you. I love football, and I will pretty much spend the next 6 months thinking about little else... (sorry honey!). My leagues are pretty diverse. I'm in a 12 team keeper league, a 12 team annual league, a 4 team joke league and a 2 team All-Star league. Those last two leagues might seem silly, but I'm telling you, they are FUN. Each team is basically made up of complete dominators, and it's a matter of playing the waiver wire well and getting lucky. I spend far more time & energy on the Keeper League, because there are a lot more bragging rights at stake, but I take them all seriously. Too seriously, I'm sure.

Here are my Top Ten rankings/thoughts, by position, on this upcoming season. Additionally, I'm going to list a 'Sleeper' or two for your benefit...

QB

Peyton Manning
Donovan McNabb
Matt Hasselbeck
Carson Palmer
Jake Delhomme
Tom Brady
Daunte Culpepper
Eli Manning
Drew Bledsoe
Kurt Warner

Sleepers: Steve McNair (could be exactly what Baltimore has needed forever if he can stay healthy), Jon Kitna (the only reason Kitna isn't still the starter in Cincy is because Carson Palmer is a future Hall of Famer, plus he'll be in Mike Martz's system, throwing to GOOD receivers), Phillip Rivers (it may seem like a stretch to have a first year guy as my sleeper, but with safety valves like Gates and Tomlinson to dump the ball to, you just never know).

RB

Shaun Alexander
Mr. Larry Johnson
Ladainian Tomlinson
Clinton Portis
Rudi Johnson
Tiki Barber
Edgerrin James
Cadillac Williams
Ronnie Brown
Brian Westbrook

Sleepers: Chester Taylor (an already good O-line is bolstered by the arrival of Pro-Bowler Steve Hutchinson from Seattle).

WR

Chad Johnson
Steve Smith
Randy Moss
Terrell Owens
Torry Holt
Chris Chambers
Larry Fitzgerald
Anquan Boldin
Marvin Harrison
Hines Ward

Sleepers: Reggie Brown (yes, I'm a homer, but everything I hear about this guy indicates that he's headed for a 1000 yard season), Kevin Curtis (don't be surprised if he takes over as the #2 in St. Louis), Matt Jones (with Jimmy Smith out of the way in Jax, this former QB looks to take the roll of go-to-guy for Byron Leftwich.)

TE

Antonio Gates
Todd Heap
Tony Gonzalez
Jeremy Shockey
Alge Crumpler
Jason Witten
Randy McMichael
L.J. Smith
Jerramy Stevens
Heath Miller

Sleeper: Eric Johnson. This guy can flat out play. I expect him to lead the Niners in receptions this year, unless he gets injured. Again.

DEF

Carolina
Chicago
Pittsburgh
Jacksonville
Indianapolis
Seattle
Tampa Bay
New York Giants
Baltimore
Philadelphia

Sleeper: Minnesota. With a stellar defensive backfield and a solid front 7, they will have an improved defensive season. Also, I expect their running game to eat up a lot of clock and put their opponents in a bind where they need to pass into the teeth of this defense at crucial points in the game.

Kickers

Neil Rackers
Adam Vinaieri
Mike Vanderjagt
David Akers
Jason Elam
John Kasay
Lawrence Tynes
Josh Brown
Jeff Reed
Jeff Wilkins

Sleeper: I'd like to take this moment to say that I think we should do away with the PAT. If there even needs to be an extra point try, teams should be required to 'go for two' at all times. As for sleepers, I have no idea. Janikowski maybe? I'm pretty sure his numbers will be up, at least.


Ok, that's it. Those are my thoughts. Take 'em or leave 'em. Go Eagles!


-The Camp Guy

Monday, July 24, 2006

The CampGuy is back...

Let's re-hash the last few big stories in sports, from my perspective...

1. The World Cup wins me over... I mean, I'm not a soccer guy (just never really got that into it, couldn't get excited about watching soccer), but the World Cup was easy to love. I think there is something intriguing about countries playing not only to win, but for national pride. The Americans were disapointing, but I was thoroughly entertained. I still have lots of qualms with the way soccer is played, officiated and coached, but I found myself cheering for some teams over other teams... I certainly wasn't happy to see France & Italy in the finals (it's like having to pick between Kobe and T.O.), but the majority of the tournament was great. Nice work Soccer, see you in 4 years.

2. T.O. came out with a book that to my knowledge has only been read by those in the Rosenhaus family... loser.

3. The Heat won the NBA Finals because that's what David Stern wanted.

4. Floyd Landis won the Tour de France in dramatic fashion and kept the US dominance at the Tour alive. Way to go Floyd!!

5. Tiger won his 11th Major. He's just SO good. The most impressive thing about Tiger is that he doesn't give up a lead. The guy has a real killer instinct, and even though it's golf, everyone should respect that ability in an athlete.

6. J-Mac, the inspirational high school basketball manager with Autism won an ESPY for his incredible 20 pts in 4:19 in a varsity high school game. One of the best stories to arise in YEARS. The kid is going to be in a movie, has met the president and is bringing awareness for Autism to millions. J-Mac for president!!

7. And finally, the Eagles opened camp on July 20th and began preparations for their domination of the over-rated NFC East. The Cowboys are doomed, the Giants will fold in big games and the Skins have Mark Brunell at QB.


The Camp Guy is back. I can't wait to get going again with the blog.

OK, also, here are some predictions.

1. The Pats will still win the AFC East. The Dolphins will be good, but they won't out-do the Pats. Culpepper is over-rated, even if he is healthy. I think they'll both make the playoffs, though.

2. The Falcons have a great shot to make the playoffs. They have an improved defense and I think Michael Vick will be improved over his dismal 2005 campaign. This is a good team. Look for them to play up to their potential. Also, I think the Panthers are being over-rated slightly. The middle of their defense is a health concern at all times (Kris Jenkins and Dan Morgan are always hurt).

3. The Seahawks will still win their division, unless Shaun Alexander gets hurt. Arizona will be good, but the season hinges on Kurt Warner. Enough said.

4. Green Bay will still stink.

5. The Rams will be mediocre.

6. New Orleans will stink.

7. The Chargers will stink.

8. The best division in football will be the AFC North, not the NFC East.

9. Brian Westbrook will rush for over 1,200 yards and have 600 yards receiving. At least.

Ok, I'm starting to foam at the mouth. I can't wait for the NFL season to begin. FOOTBALL!!


-The Camp Guy

Monday, May 01, 2006

NFL DRAFT REVIEW

I love the draft. It's one of my favorite weekends of the year. In the weeks (ok, months) leading up to the draft, I think I do more work breaking down the college talent and the franchise needs than I do at my REAL job. I also love it because among my friends (a small group of sports nuts) I feel like Mel Kiper Jr., which is a funny feeling to say the least. I think next year I'm going to challenge Mel Kiper to a 'Draft Off' where we each pick the first round and see who comes out with the most right picks. I swear I could kick his butt. :) But enough about me and how I have too much time on my hands and aspire to have big hair. On to the my thoughts on the draft...

1. Don't be fooled by the Texans and their statement that they picked Mario Williams as a 'football decision'. This was a financial decision. No chance they had Mario Williams rated higher than Bush. No one did, and there was a perfectly good reason for that. Bush is incredible. Williams had, like, 2 good games when he decided to play hard in college and all the sudden people are letting themselves be fooled by Kubiak & Co. Bush would have been too hard to sign, and so they went with the next best thing, a 6'7", 295 lb. monster of a DE.

2. I would have picked Leinart over Young if I was the Titans.

3. The NY Jets had a solid draft. The fact that they got the best Tackle and best interior lineman in the draft is fantastic. I was very impressed that Mangini went this direction. The rest of their picks were average at best. I think people are over-rating their overall draft performance.

4. The 49ers made a mistake. Vernon Davis isn't a great blocker and they already have a fantastic pass catching TE in Eric Johnson. I think Davis has the opportunity to do very well in their system, but the fact is, the Niners have more needs than they know what to do with. They should have addressed those other needs. Johnson set records for catches and yards two seasons ago and didn't need to be replaced.

5. The Giants surprised me with their pick of Mathias Kiwanuka, a DE, with the last pick of the 1st round. This guy got OWNED by D'Brickashaw Ferguson at the Senior Bowl and they've already got the best DE tandem in the league. Bad pick I think. I liked the pick of Sinorice Moss, though, and I think he'll be very successful playing in a system that already spreads defenses pretty thin (Burress, Shockey and Tiki).

6. The Cheifs REALLY reached with the pick of Tamba Hali. I think he's undersized for the NFL and I don't see him making a huge impact, although, I could be wrong. The guy is driven.

7. Obviously the Cardinals have got to be STOKED that Leinart dropped all the way to #10. And you know what, if I'm Leinart, I'm stoked too. I get to look forward to years handing the ball to Edge when I'm in a jam and throwing the ball to the best young WR tandem in the league (Bolden and Fitzgerald). Not only that, but the Cards drafted him a huge TE in Gabe Watson from Georgia to throw to. The Cards had the 2nd best draft in the league.

8. The Eagles had the best draft overall. Yeah, yeah, I know, I'm just a Philly fan, right? Well I am, but that's why I have the right to say this. You see, the average Philly fan is hard to please, and I'm worse than most. Generally, I'm upset after a draft, no matter how good it looks on paper. This year is different though. We got the best DT prospect in the draft, the 2nd best OT, the 2nd best OG, the 1-AA sack leader 2 years running AND an 80 catch receiver from Michigan (in the 4th round). I like that the Eagles are so dedicated to solidifying the line of scrimmage and I think they did a fantastic job of bulking up the trenches. Considering that many pundits assumed we would pick Winston Justice with the 14th pick and we got him with the 39th pick. I'd say that sums up the value the Eags got out of their picks, and on draft day, it's all about value.


That's what I think, take it or leave it.

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

I CAN'T STAND T.O.

And it's not just because I'm an Eagles fan. Did you hear that he just made a rap about himself and how great it is that Dallas paid him $10 million guarantees to sign with them? His rap is about as cool as Kobe's rap, and that one was about as cool as broken ribs. What a loser.

I'll stop short of hoping he gets hurt or injured or whatever, but I've lost all love for TO. The Cowboys will probably see the ugly side of TO even faster now because of all the money they've already given him and I PROMISE that TO and Bledsoe will not get along. Here's how I know:

TO is not just a great receiver, he's a great effort receiver. He works best with a QB who can scramble because, in essence, TO is a scrambler. He's not a superb route runner like Marvin Harrison/Jerry Rice. He's all effort and athleticism. Many of his big plays are because TO gets open EVENTUALLY and a QB who can keep the play alive longer makes him look better (Garcia and McNabb are great examples). The fact that Bledsoe has lead feet will bring drama. I can see it now, and I actually pity the poor people in Dallas.

Actually, that's not true.

Oh, and who are these idiots talking about how TO and Rosenhaus got more money from Dallas than they would have gotten from Philly? What? TO would have made 49 million if he had just kept his fat mouth shut and played great football. Instead, he'll make 25 million over the next 3 years. Then he'll be about 36. That's pretty old. Does he think he'll get another 4 year contract worth 24 mill. after that? Doubtful. TO is worse off now than he would have been if he'd just played out his contract with the Eagles. And what's sad is, he'd probably have more rings staying with Philly. Dallas will be good this year, there's no doubt about that, but they're not going to bring home the Lombardi Trophy, and when things fall apart around TO, which they will, Parcells will retire, and the 'Boys will falter. Again.

That's what I think. Take it or leave it.


-The Camp Guy

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

THE NCAA TOURNAMENT

My favorite sporting event of the year!! I love NCAA basketball, and I really love the tourney. I filled out three brackets. One has Duke winning, one has UConn and the last has Memphis taking it down. My Duke bracket is totally shot (had Michigan State, Oklahoma, Syracuse and Kansas winning), my UConn bracket is in ok shape and my Memphis bracket is looking GREAT! I've got 13 of 16 teams remaining and 7 of 8 of my Elite Eight teams available. Not bad, but let's be honest, these things are a total crap shoot. Inevitably, my pool is won by somebody's girlfriend each year, who picks the teams based on favorite color and proximity to her grandmother's vacation home.

One thing that bothers me about the Tourney is all the bickering about the selection committee. Every year they produce an amazing set of brackets, every year there is great drama, every year some team they let in that people wail about turns out to be awesome. This year it's George Mason. What a bunch of total dominators those fellas turned out to be! Imagine if Hofstra had come to the the Big Dance instead...

At this point, I'd like to give out some awards.

1) Dignan's "Biggest Lemon in the Tournament" - Brandon Heath of San Diego State. That guy really lemoned out at the end of his first round game against Indiana. Thanks to his two big men, SDSU had the game in the bag. All Health had to do was NOT turn the ball over. So what does he do? A couple of fancy cross overs right in front of a fiesty Indiana defender. Eventually, the ball spills into the backcourt, and Health thinks it'll be a violation if he grabs the ball, so he just LEAVES it there on the ground only to be picked up by Indy, and eventually turned into a go-ahead 3 pointer. Again, this guy is a total lemon.

2) "Best Clutch Performance" - Adam Morrison of Gonzaga. He was great against Xavier. That guy is probably a few chimichangas short of a fiesta platter, but man is he a dominant scorer. I saw the score on the ticker the whole game and kept thinking to myself, "Don't worry, Morrison will win it for them." And he did. Also of note is that I had picked Gonzaga to lose in all 3 brackets and changed all 3 the night before the first games to have them winning, because I was so sure Morrison wouldn't let them lose. Take that Derek Hyatt!!

3) "Most Likely to Bother me if they Win the whole thing" - Florida. I don't like these guys. I don't like Noah, I don't like Billy Donovan, and I don't like Florida basketball in general. The problem is, I have no good reason for feeling this way. In fact, it's almost as if I feel like I SHOULD like them, but don't. Go Georgetown!

4) "Favorite Team in the Tourney" - 'Nova. I have to admit, I'm on the Villanova bandwagon. I'm originally from Philly, so I have some right to cheer for Nova, but it's not like I went there, and I wasn't a big 'Nova fan until they started winning. That being said, GO NOVA!! I love this 4 guard offense and I dig the way Jay Wright coaches (and dresses for that matter). A three piece suit!?! Are you kidding me? What is this, the Oscars? I bet his players bust his chops all the time for trying to be way cooler than he actually is... Whatever, Go Nova and Go Jay Wright!


Well, that's it for now. But just so you know, I'm seriously considering calling in sick this Thursday so that I can watch more basketball. Until next time, Go Nova, Go Duke, Go Memphis and go Adam Morrison & Company.


-The Camp Guy

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

The Winter Olympics

Ok, so I watched a lot of the winter olympics this year and I have a few thoughts. Only a few though, because to be honest, the Winter Olympics just don't grab me the way the Summer Olympics do. There are lots of reasons Americans just weren't that into the Olympics this year, and I think it's sad that as a country we care so little about the athletes representing our country.... but it is what it is. I'm not gonna deny that I can understand where most Americans are coming from on this one.

Here are some of my thoughts:

1. "Sports" with judges lend themselves to being less interesting by nature. Anything that is fundamentally subjective by nature is going to be less interesting than hockey, downhill skiing, etc.

2. The Opening Ceremonies were totally weird. What was with all the American 80's music? I kept waiting for 'Safety Dance' to come on... I didn't understand why the Italians chose that type of theme. Didn't seem to fit the nature of the Olympics. Or maybe it did this time around?

3. I have a hard time respecting participants if I can honestly say, "Man, I went to college with a guy who looked just like that... and he was SUCH a stoner!!"

4. Bode Miller deserves about 0.000125% of the press he gets. Let's stop talking about the drunk skier who puts his partying before his country and talk more about Joey Cheek, who donated his $25,000 bonus to a child relief charity in Darfur, Sudan. Now THAT'S a worthwhile story. Good for him!

5. I love Olympic hockey. Even though I'm not a big hockey, soccer or baseball fan, I really like the idea of Olympic hockey (and other team sports), World Cup soccer and the World Baseball Classic. I'm all for teams representing their country and I think this year, with all those events going on, will be pretty sweet for fans all over the world.


That is all. Unfortunately, no matter how much respect I have for the years and years of hard work and practice each of the athletes has put into their events, I just can't get as excited as I do for other competitive venues. That said, way to go Team USA. I think, for the most part, you all did a great job and represented your country with class.

That's what I think. Take it or leave it.


-The Camp Guy

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Is Peyton Manning a Great QB?

Peyton Manning is a funny one, isn't he? This weekend, for the millionth time, Manning lost the big game. To be honest, it's a bit depressing for me. And I'm not even a Colts fan.

For years and years, I've hoped that Peyton would play his best and win the big one. For years I've thought that he was under-rated and that many people just didn't realize how great he was, how important a player he is and that yes, someday, he would win the Super Bowl in convincing fashion. I was a Manning apologist. I made the "cold-weather excuse", the "poor-defense excuse", the "Ty Law was mugging Marvin excuse"... all of them.

After watching Sunday's loss to the Steelers, I'm sure there are other Manning apologists that are dedicating themselves to the, "his O-line sucks excuse", but I am not among them. It is true that Tarik Glenn (who publicly took the blame for the loss) and Co. did a sub-par job of protecting Manning, but I'm done making excuses. In fact, starting with last year's playoff loss to New England, I began to believe what the nay-sayers have been saying for years.

Let's look at the facts. When Manning was at Tennessee, he was dubbed a great leader, a compulsive video nut and a future hall-of-famer. His pedigree was unprecedented and he had just enough success for those who WANTED to see him do well to justify saying that he was going to be the an unbelievable success. The problem is, Manning's job wasn't to be really, really good. His job was to win when it mattered, which is what great QB's do. Manning didn't do this! He lost every year to arch-rival Florida and Tennessee won the national championship without Manning immediately after he graduated! That early in his career, it would have been somewhat unfair to Manning to assume this trend would continue, but it is worth noting that the trend existed.

To compound this pro-Manning sentiment, Ryan Leaf (who was also supposed to be a great QB from the same draft class) failed miserably in the NFL. Meanwhile, Manning saw early success in his career, setting records and showing poise in his first few years.

Since then, it seems as though Manning has done everything he has always done. He has won the majority of his games. He has passed for a record number of yards, TDs and completions. He has led a no-huddle offense the likes of which the NFL has never seen (even more thorough than Jim Kelly's offense) and has helped put Indianapolis on the map. In short, he has been very, very, very good.

Problem is, he lost in the 2000 playoffs to Tennessee, in 2001 to Miami (in OT), didn't make the 2002 playoffs after Edgerrin James got hurt (curiously losing 7 of 8 after his injury) finishing with a 6-10 record, lost 41-0 to the Jets in 2003, lost 24-14 to New England in 2004, 20-3 to the Pats again in 2005 and then this Sunday, they lost to 6th seed Pittsburgh 21-18 in a game that wasn't nearly that close (no thanks to the officiating crew). Peyton Manning has lost every game that really mattered to his team since he got under center.

Now, I'm the first to recognize that even the best QBs have often had luck/chance/good fortune/etc. on their side and that these same QBs are only 1 man on a team of 53. I'll also be the first to admit that Peyton has had some less than perfect conditions to deal with. But like I said before, I'm done making excuses for him. Manning simply doesn't win when it matters most. And it stands to reason that because of the control over the play-calling, adjustments, etc. that he has, he should be held even more responsible than any 'normal' QB. How many times, for instance, did Peyton try to move the pocket to account for the Pittsburgh blitz?

Teams simply find a way to beat him and he is unable to find answers in times of crisis. As invincible as he has seemed lately, in the regular season, he seems equally beatable in the post-season, when he could wipe the slate clean forever. He looks, at times, like the pressure brings out the worst in him. We've all seen the 'Peyton Manning Face', the one he makes that looks as hopeless as possible. As someone who wants to see Manning succeed, this is a terribly frustrating trend.

To be honest, I still think he'll win the Super Bowl, eventually. He's good enough that I feel like EVENTUALLY, the cards will fall in his favor. But at this point, Manning has made a name for himself as a choker. To reverse his reputation, Manning would have to win the Super Bowl in a come-from-behind, only man for the job, ice water in his veins way. Anything less than a spectacular and heroic performance will leave doubt in the minds of everyone who has ever watched him play. Including me.

Until that happens, Peyton Manning is NOT one of the best 15 or so QBs of all-time. All those haters who think Manning is a better QB than Brady are idiots. Those that say he is an all-time great are simply wrong and care more about stats and games against the Texans than they should. He has been over-rated for years and I'm done waiting for him to fulfill the optimistic forecast we all had for him in college.

This is what I think. Take it or leave it. Think differently? Email me at campguy@sportscamper.com




Monday, January 09, 2006

The Camp Guy Answers Camp Questions!

Q: Hello, I got your e-mail when I was looking for a basketball league in the areas of Pleasanton or Dublin ( California). Can you help me with that? I really don't like the league thru our Community Center. There is no competition. I have a 11 and 8 year old they been playing since they were 4 years old. I hope you can help us. Thank you!- Jorgelina

A: Hi Jorgelina! Thanks for writing. There are some great youth basketball camps in your area. Please check out this link with information on several camps in your area - http://www.sfgokids.com/pages/basket.htm

- The Camp Guy

Q: Hi! Last year my daughter went to volleyball camp at Lincoln Christian College in Lincoln Illinois. I can't find any information about this camp on the internet. Please let me know if you have any information regarding this camp. Thanks! Terri Devlin

A: Terri, I found some information on the camps provided by Lincoln Christian College. Looks like they offer MANY different camps, including 3 volleyball camps. I hope this link helps your daughter find the camping experience she is looking for - http://www.lccs.edu/athletics/

- The Camp Guy

Q: My name is Anthony and I am 21 years old. I just relocated here in Austin from New Orleans due to Hurricane Katrina, and am trying to find a good Speed Camp here, in Austin. Any help you can provide is deeply appreciated.

A: Hi Anthony. Glad to hear you are alive and safe in Austin, TX. It's a beautiful city with a lot to enjoy. Check out this link to gather more information on the U. of Texas speed camp. http://www.texassports.com/index.php?s=&change_well_id=2&url_article_id=176

- The Camp Guy

Q: I'm looking for any softball camps/clinics in Wisconsin... Please send me any info that you may have. Thank you! -Marla Duerwachter

A: Hi Marla! The University of Wisconsin offers a great variety of softball camps on their campus. Go to http://www.uwbadgers.com/camps/sb/index.aspx for more information. I believe they have 6 camps... some for pitchers and catchers, some for teams, some for individual skill improvement. Happy Camping!

-The Camp Guy

Q: We are interested in a Cross Country camp in Texas if you have one. Our son is 16 and has been running on the team for 4 years. He is wanting to go to a camp in Texas if one is available. Please contact us if anything is available. Thank-you! - Cyndie Betz

A: Cyndie, I think your best bet is The Baylor Cross Country camp. They don't have the information for their 2006 camp up on their site yet, but if you contact them soon, they will be able to keep you updated on their sign up information. http://baylorbears.collegesports.com/camps/camps-c-xc.html

- The Camp Guy

Q: Hi Camp Guy:I am searching for affordable basketball and football summer camp(s). Ihave a niece that is 10 years old that I want to send to basketball camp. In addition, I have two nephews, one is 8 years old, and the other is 9 years old that I want to send to football camp. If youcould, please provide me with as many camps that are available in the Dallas/Ft. Worth Area, or a camp that they could stay overnight. Thank you in advance for your help!! Sincerely, Amanda Meazell

A: Amanda, I think you should take a look at The University of North Texas sports camps. They have 3 separate girls basketball camps and a football camp for ages 8 and up. http://www.unt.edu/athletics.htm

-The Camp Guy

Q: Hello,I am emailing you to get some information on basketball camps in the Georgia/Alabama area for my 16 yr old son. I am using his email address so that you can email him back with any info that you may have directly. His name is Johnathan and he is looking for a camp or a league type of activity for the upcoming summer. Any information that you may have pretaining to dates, times, and pricing, please let us know. We would greatly appreciate your assistance. Mrs. Turk and Johnathan too :) Have a Blessed Day! Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

A: Thanks for writing! I would recommend looking at the University of Alabama basketball camp for a 16 year old. Here is a direct link to a great deal of information on this camp. Good Luck, Jonathan! http://www.rolltide.com/Mens%20Basketball/4521.asp

-The Camp Guy

Q: Hey camp guy, My name is Jim Jordan. I live in the eastern panhandle of West Virginia. I have a 14 year old son who is very interested in developing his football skills. We are looking for camps over the winter months and into spring. We found lots of summer camps, but we want to start immediately if possible. Do you know of any camps available in the MD, WV, VA, or PA areas? Any info would be greatly appreciated. We would even consider personal tudors if any exist. Thank you for your time and consideration. -Jim Jordan

A: Hi Jim. Unfortunately, I don't know of any winter or spring football clinics in those areas, but rest assured, I will keep my eyes open for camps of this nature. What position does your son play? I'm available for ad-hoc, weekend, one on one clinics for quarterbacks and receivers anywhere in the United States.


Hope you all found this information useful. Send YOUR questions to campguy@sportscamper.com!

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Coaching Decisions, the National Championship and Statistics...


About the game itself -

I've been thinking about that National Championship game since it ended. There is SO much to think about. First of all, let's all just take a minute to realize how great Vince Young is. He's the type of player that is so good, that on almost every play, I thought the USC defense was in slow motion. See, with a guy like Michael Vick, you know you're watching someone who is super fast. But with Vince Young, he's moving SO much faster AND smoother than those around him that he simply makes everyone else look really slow/clumsy. He's unreal. The jury is out on how good he'll be in the Pro's, but for now, he just might be the best player in the country. This was the first time I saw a Texas game from start to finish, and what a game. I for one hope he enters the draft, but that's a whole different column.

As for Reggie Bush, I thought he wasn't used as well as he could have been, which is on Pete Carroll (he was on the BENCH during that 4th & 2), but good grief, what was that attempted lateral all about?? That was stupid. Probably some cockiness mixed in there, too. Now, I love Reggie, but that bone headed move may have cost his team some points (at least 3). He did have 177 yards from scrimmage and a touchdown (which, in any other game, would have been excellent), but his mistake and the great play of Vince Young are what will be remembered from this game.

Now, about the 4th & 2 conversion decision. Let me go on record as supporting Pete Carroll's decision. I think, taking everything into account, I would have done the same thing. There is certainly part of me that think, "Hey, you punt it down to the 10, they have to go 90 yards in 2 minutes, let's see if they can do it." But I think, in THIS case, the right decision was to go for it, especially considering how White had been churning out yards all night and considering how good the Texas punt block team is. There have been a lot of people in many media sources claiming that it was a terrible decision. I think they are idiots. There have also been lots of people saying that no matter what, Texas was gonna score, so you had to get the first down. I think they are idiots, too. The simple fact is, the value of an estimated 85 yard drive was slightly lower for USC than the expected value of the possible 4th down conversion (game over), weighed against a possible 56 yard drive. Now, that may not be why Carroll made that decision, but that's why it was a good decision. I have no problem with those that say they would have punted. 4th and 2 is a alot more daunting than 4th & 1. The Texas defense had already stuffed them on a 4th and 1 earlier in the game. So yeah, I can understand someone punting. In hindsight, we can all realize it MIGHT have given them the win. But then again, hindsight is always 20/20.

In discussing this 4th and 2 topic today, my friends and I got into some pretty heated debates (as we always do). Mostly they surrounded statistics/probability and coaching decisions. Some of my buddies think that Texas would have scored no matter what, so USC had to go for it. I already told you what I think of this opinion. But it got us on the topic of good in-game coaching.

My buddy S.H. is a pretty analytical guy. One of the smartest guys I know. He thinks that there are a whole ton of coaching errors being made in college and in the pros. I agree with some of them, but not all. Here's a list of coaching decisions that my friend said need to change NOW:

1) "Attempting field goals on 4th & inches up to 4th and goal from the 3, especially early in games, especially with good offensive teams, especially in bad conditions, is done way too often." - I agree with him on this, under those conditions, especially. I think going for the TD in that case, in bad weather (hard to kick), where you're probably gonna pin them deep in their territory anyhow if you don't score, is a good decision.

2) "Punting from around the 50 yard line and "relying on your defense" rather than going for a short 4th down, is done way too often." - This is a silly claim. I think this is totally dependant on the situation, the defense, the time of game, how short the distance to go is (2 is much longer than 1 in some games), your punters abilities, their punt block team, their QB's apparent late-game ability, etc. Totally conditional.. 2 minute drives of over 80 yards, for a TD, are VERY rare. Which is why those clutch few QBs that lead such drives often are held in such high esteem (Montana, Elway, Brady, Marino...) For this reason, I must say that my friend is making an unfounded, vast generalization.

3) "Scoring too quickly at the end of the game when you could have run some clock. Sure, you put your points at slight risk, but the risk of the other team using that time left to score is way greater in many cases." - I think this can only apply in some cases. Sure I think it's a great idea if you're already up, or if your defense is terrible, or if the offense you're playing against simply can't be stopped, but again, there are many factors to take into account. I certainly don't think this is a good "MOST of the time" football principle.

4) "Giving up yards or not making tackles for the sake of trying to strip the ball out is the right play way more often then those orders seem to be given." - Actually, I think the strip is becoming much more commonplace and, if done right, can be part of a pretty solid, fundamental tackle. Stripping the ball is practiced by every team in America, multiple times a week. However, it IS very important for your players to be focused on actually tackling while they strip the ball, because arm tackles can very quickly become touchdowns for the other team. Happens all the time. Also, I can tell you from being a coach, that a team that is TOO focused on stripping the ball often loses sight of just playing agressive, hard hitting defense, which can just as easily force a fumble and is far more effective, especially against mature opponents.

5) "Deep 4th down interceptions aren't condemned enough." - I totally agree about this. Man is that a bone-headed move. However, I must say that I think this is more about stupid players than it is about coaches making that decision. I would venture to say that no player is coached to make deep, 4th down interceptions.

6) "Going down on one of those end of the game plays rather than intentionally fumbling is not condemned enough." - This is pretty rare, but yes, I agree wholeheartedly. Why on earth would you let the game die if you had the chance to fumble it back to life?

7) "Scoring a touchdown to go up 8, when if you just went down after getting the first down, the game would have been over there is no excuse for." - I agree with this, too. It's no different than a QB taking a knee, and RBs/WRs need to be coached to do this.

(this next one is the big kahuna)

8) "And there are times when running backs should throw the ball away like quarterbacks do instead of taking a big loss." - This is a worthless and bad point. If in 0.00000000000000000000000000000000125 percent of the instances it might make sense to have them do it to save 5-7 yards, it still matters very little and is so worthless a coaching point that wasting anyone's time with it (especially RBs who just don't need to be thinking about crap like this, and for the most part, can't think through complex situations in the middle of a broken play) may actually be more harmful to your team's success in the long run than the measely 5 yards every once in a blue moon. That's how rare a good situation for this type of thing really is. It's not a terrible point if you can be sure it would work out. But you would have to use this PERFECTLY, and there is no assurance that it would be used perfectly, and that is really the sticking point for me. If you had an RB who you could be SURE would not screw it up, ok, go for it in that rarest of rare occasion. The problem is, you really just don't know for sure, and the things that could go wrong (slippery hands, didn't see the other tackler coming as he was pulling the ball out, slips and fumbles, accidently gets hit as he throws or the ball slips from his hands and goes backwards/straight up, etc.) are numerous and deadly. The expected value of this coaching point is DEFINITELY negative, and therefore, it is a terrible claim by my friend.


Well, that's what I think, take it or leave it. If you have any thoughts about this or any other post of mine, feel free to comment below...

Friday, December 30, 2005

Week 17, NFL Picks... and, other stuff...

Chargers over Broncos - The Chargers might be the best non-playoff team in my lifetime.

Giants over Raiders - The Raiders are bad, bad, bad.

Steelers over Lions - I love Hines Ward. What a stud. Is there a more easy to like player in the entire NFL? This guy plays harder than anyone, and he SMILES the whole time!

Cardinals over Colts - Weird.

Panthers over Falcons - Michael Vick is SO over-rated. I'd love to hear from anyone who disagrees.

Buccaneers over Saints - I feel like the Bucs have fooled people into thinking they are a decent team, but they're not. It's just that the Saints are worse.

Ravens over Browns - I'm starting Jamal Lewis on my fantasy team this week. His history against the Browns is top shelf material.

Seahawks over Packers - Here's hoping that the Texans win, the Saints lose, the Packers lose and as a result, the Saints have the first pick, take Leinart, and then the Pack get pick #2, and get Bush. I'd love to see Bush doing the Lambeau leap. Probably not gonna happen....

Bills over Jets - When Kelly Holcomb is CLEARLY your best QB, you have problems.

Patriots over Dolphins - Nick Saban should be in the discussion for coach of the year. I know Lovie Smith, Marvin Lewis and Tony Dungy are getting a lot of attention, but Saban is really doing good things with this team.

Chiefs over Bengals - I'm assuming the Bengals don't play their starters for too long.

Jags over Titans - Is Garrard better than Leftwich? At this point, I might just keep him in there if I'm Jack Del Rio....

Vikings over Bears - A great defense is really just fun to watch. I know it can seem boring to some, but if you really love pure football, watching a ferocious, swarming defense is pure entertainment.

Skins over Eagles - 6-10 means a better draft pick than 7-9. Go Skins! At some point, you have to think like GM and not like a fan.

Cowboys over Rams - Parcells might retire. I'd retire, too if I had to coach Keyshawn Johnson.

and in the Reggie Bush Bowl (drumroll please)

49ers over the Texans - Let's be honest, the Texans aren't gonna let this one slip away. They don't want to win. They want the pick of the litter. They want Reggie Bush! Also, the 49ers WANT to win. Badly. They can't afford to pay for another super high draft pick. Besides, the Niners are a better team...


Leave me a comment if you want...

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Fighting in Sports

Did you see the fight on Monday Night Football between Patriot's RB Corey Dillon and Jets LB Jonathan Vilma? It was incredible. First of all, they both unleashed multiple punches, grappling for nearly a minute, just wailing on eachother. Then, suddently, Vilma ripped off Corey Dillon's helmet and started beating him over the head with it like big, silver club. What was really amazing was that the fight wasn't broken up, the refs sort of just let it happen and the teammates of both players just stood by and watched, apparently amused by the whole scenario. The crowd cheered loudly and eventually, the fight ended. Vilma was ejected from the game, and Dillon was held out of play for a few minutes. Then, today, the NFL laid down a measly $2,500 fine on Vilma for his brutal attack. The whole thing just blows my mind! If you missed it then...



you're just like the rest of us. This fight never happened. The NFL would never let something like that happen.


But an identical situation DID occur in the NHL on Monday night, and you know what? I'm sick of it. Toronto's Darcy Tucker and New Jersey's Cam Janssen decided they needed to shed eachother's blood, so they went at it for a while. Tucker then ripped off Jannsen's helmet and bashed him on the head with it. Only one of the players (Tucker) was ejected, the NHL isn't taking major action and SportsCenter glorified these thugs for all to see. Are you KIDDING me?!?! This is backwards, rotten and hurtful to the word 'Sport'.

The problem here isn't Tucker, or Janssen, or any player (like Tie Domi, for instance) that fights often. They are simply a product of a larger problem. NHL hockey, itself. Now, don't get me wrong, there's a lot to love about hockey. I lived in Canada for 3 years and I learned a lot about the sport, its culture and its people. Lot's a of good there, but the NHL and the leagues that feed the NHL have OK'ed this senseless, shameless brutality, and that's not right.

My basic problem with the league-sponsored fistfights is that many people will now try to tell you it's part of the sport. What? How is that part of the sport? What is sporting about this crap? Generally, the guys who start fights are expendable. They are fighting because they're some sort of of goon/intimidator who goes around punching people in the temple for the soul purpose of getting other, more valuable players booted from the game. Sure that can be considered "strategy" in some warped way, but the only reason anyone considers it strategy is because the league condones it. To any rational person, it's just dirty, cheap and underhanded.

The NHL is the problem. Since the actual sport of hockey can't seem to compete with the other major leagues in terms of popular interest, they have resorted to turning their league (and subsequently their sport) into a sideshow. The NHL should be more responsible than that. They should realize that they basically have a monopoly in North America (and much of the world) on what kids recognize as good hockey and should develop their sport around how it SHOULD be played, what makes for better hockey/better hockey players... not around how the average drunken man in Detroit or Montreal reacts when a player gets popped in the nose.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for tough guys. I love a good hit and I think hockey has plenty of room for TONS of hits, checks, elbows, blood, guts, etc... However, there is a difference between toughness within the bounds of what is good for the sport, and "toughness" that is simply on display for no good reason other than the almighty dollar.

I'm sure the NBA could make fistfights legal, and players like Ben Wallace could donkey punch Kobe Bryant every so often until he fought back, and sure some drunken bozo in the stands would love every second of it, but would it be good for the sport? No. It would deteriorate further, a sport that has already strayed from its purpose (see Magic, Larry, MJ and Isaiah for the definition of real basketball).

The fighting in the NHL must be outlawed. If players fight, it should be broken up immediately by the refs and both players should be ejected, fined extensively and possibly suspended for a game. What's more, repeat offenders should have increasingly harsher penalties so that teams can ill afford to sign on goons. The brand of hockey that can and will result from a fight-free league would be a higher caliber than the slop we see today. I promise.


That's what I think, take it or leave it...

Thursday, December 22, 2005

OVER-RATED/UNDER-RATED...

Over-rated/Under-rated is one of the all-time best games. You can do it with pretty much anything, food, movies, music, politicians, athletes, coaches... anything. Basically, you just make a list of things you think are over-rated (or under-rated) and then your friends/family/teammates can argue with you. It's a hoot.

The biggest misconception in this game is that people will often mistake an 'over-rated' rating for a 'bad' rating. For instance, I think the Beatles are a great band. Maybe the best ever. And yet, I would say they are over-rated, simply because of the unimaginable amount of credit they get, as compared to other bands. Same with Michael Jordan. I certainly think he's the best basketball player of all time, and yet, I think he's over-rated. Essentially, people end up thinking that you think the Beatles and MJ are not that good, when you're really saying that they are AWESOME, just a little bit less great than they are given credit for being. Avoid this mistake and the game is tons of fun. This game is based on the premise that NOTHING is perfectly rated. It's either under-rated or over-rated.

For example, I think orange juice is over-rated. I think Barry Sanders is under-rated. I think the '91 Eagles defense is under-rated, I think Dan Marino is over-rated, I think Karl Malone is over-rated, I think Emmitt Smith is over-rated, I think Dominique Wilkins was over-rated and I think Michael Vick is over-rated. See? You're getting all worked up, aren't you?

I think from now on, Thursdays will be "Over-rated/Under-rated" day. Today's topic, Tom Brady. Is he over-rated or under-rated?

My buddy and I have been talking about this all day. On the one hand, you could argue that Tom Brady receives too much credit and is considered better than he actually is solely because he happened to win 3 Super Bowls, got lucky on the 'Tuck Rule' play and was surrounded by talent.

On the other hand, you could argue that he was the very reason the Pats made a run in the first place and he was personally responsible for winning all three of those games, when it mattered, in the clutch, with his arm, and deserves even MORE credit than he has gotten thanks to the fame of Charlie Weis, Romeo Crennel, Belichick, the Pats Defense, etc., etc.

It's a vicious cycle. We've been arguing about it all day long, and quite frankly, the innocent bystanders in our heated debate are getting pretty tired of it. But it's still fun. What do you think? Over-rated or Under-rated?

I think Brady is slightly under-rated. I think most people aren't quite ready to put him ahead of Staubach, Favre, Aikman, Bradshaw and Young. I disagree with these folks. I think Brady is a top 5 all-time QB. I haven't always thought this, but he has convinced me. It used to really bother me when people compared Brady to Montana, but it doesn't bother me as much anymore. I still think Montana was the best of all time, but I think Brady is closer than people give him credit for. I'd still put Montana, Elway, Unitas and MAYBE Marino ahead of him, but that's it.

Tell me what you think. Brady, is he over-rated or under-rated?

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Brett Favre

Many people have declared that the Brett Favre Era is over. They are probably right. Last night, in Baltimore, he and the Packers lost 48-3 against one of the worst teams in the league. It was hard to watch, and quite frankly, I think Brett has been in over his head all season.

You see, I think the Brett Favre era ended when Green Bay let two of their best O-linemen and their best DB go in free agency. It ended further when Javon Walker blew out his knee. It ended even more when Ahman Green's season ended early and it is very much over today. In fact, the Brett Favre era has been over for a while. Brett can make a good team better, and on some nights, he can put a bad team on his shoulders and gunsling his way to a win (or at least a close loss like the MNF game this year against Carolina). The fact is, the Packers are HORRIBLE. Their O-line is bad. Their best RB was a 3rd string I-AA player. Their defense gave up 48 against KYLE BOLLER!! They stink.

Joe Montana couldn't win with these suckers. Neither could Elway or Marino or Unitas. They suck, and that's that. The difference is, Montana and Unitas might lose a bit less dramatically. They'd probably lead one or two TD drives a game that made them look respectable. They'd never force a pass, never take big chances, etc. They'd still lose, but they'd lose in a way that would convince people that they were not the problem.

Brett Favre has no interest in being conservative. He KNOWS that the only way the Pack can win a game, even against the lowly Ravens, is to go for broke. So he does it. Sure he could have managed some games better this year, including last night, but he still would have lost all of them. The Packers are NO GOOD. That's why they lose. It's not because of Brett Favre's 2 interceptions a game.

Now, having said that, I think Brett's gunslinging was A-ok when his arm was top-shelf, when his O-line could block, when he was surrounded by above average talent and when he was at the peak of his athletic ability. But as he has aged, his arm has weakened, his feet have slowed and his the level of talent around him (particularly in front of him) has gotten steadily worse. This is a bad combo.

It used to be that he could throw off his back foot and still leave bruises on his receivers hands. Now the ball hangs a bit longer, waiting to be picked off. It used to be that he could outrun linebackers when he was in trouble. Now he gets run down by 260 pound young men, hungry for a roster spot. He's old. His arm is old. And more importantly, his style of play is old. The gunslinger is dead. The methodical, cold blooded QB who is more scientist than gambler (Brady, Manning, Palmer, Brees, McNabb) is absolutely necessary in today's NFL. The all important turnover ratio has no time for Favre, and because he has refused to change, he has been exposed.

I would still take Favre over Vick, Collins, Brooks, Carr, Brunell, Grossman, Garcia, Warner, Smith, Boller, Losman and others, but he is no longer one of the premier QBs in the league. He had his time, and he was fun to watch for a string of seasons that I will not soon forget. But his time has passed. What's sad is, usually I don't care at all about aging players continuing to play past their prime and into insignificance, in fact, I encourage it. With Favre, it's different. It's not just his physical tools that are waning. I think his ability to win the game with his HEAD has been diminished, and that is much sadder to watch.

I love Brett Favre. I'll always be a fan for what he brought to the NFL, for his energy and boyish love for the game. He was a refreshing player in a world of money hungry prima-donnas. If he comes back to play next year, I'll cheer for him as loud as I always do. I just hope he doesn't...

Sunday, December 18, 2005

The Thing About Backups

Sometimes in the NFL, a starter will get benched, or hurt or whatever, and the backup, who you are SURE isn't that good, comes in and plays pretty well, sometimes shows some flashes of real ability, and confuses you into thinking he could actually be a very good QB in the NFL. Everyone hopes he'll be a diamond in the rough, and then within the next few weeks, he falls apart and shows his true 'backup' colors. (Koy Detmer has done it before, Bobby Hoying did it, Rex Grossman did it tonight, Sage Rosenfels has done it, Ryan Fitzpatrick did it this season and Brooks Bollinger even looked decent at one point this year).

Now, of course a backup QB is a backup for a reason, maybe a couple of reasons. All these reasons are valid and sometimes backup QBs are just downright BAD. And, on the flip side, some backups have been unjustly riding the pine. But I've noticed that often some pretty average QBs make a flash in the pan performance, and I had often speculated that there was a pattern, a good reason.

What I think it comes down to, is that the NFL is so specific, and each defense is so finely trained to react to the starting QB as part of their game plan, they don't quite know what to do when a backup comes in. They don't have their timing right, their pass rush is affected by the depth of the backup's drop, the DBs and LBs are thrown off by QBs tendencies to look off receivers, arm strength, timing on routes and running ability, and the coaches who meticulously put together these gameplans are at a loss, because they haven't had weeks of film to study on this guy. I know this sounds elementary, but keep your eyes open for this phenomenon. It's worth observing.

A week later, after the NFL has a week to study you, they make you look like the imposter you really are (most of the time). The NFL is so scientific, so meticulous, so precise with their planning, so perfect with their film study, that you'll only fool a decent team once. Fool 'em twice, and you might just be a decent QB (Steve Young, Brad Johnson, Tom Brady, etc.)!

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

J. Whyatt Mondesire is a Moron!

In what I can only describe as an idiotic and pointless display of his inability to understand the NFL, history, football in general and race as it pertains to the sports world, J. Whyatt Mondesire (President of the Philadelphia chapter of the NAACP) wrote a scathing editorial about Donovan McNabb yesterday. Among other things, he accused McNabb of selling out his race (because he doesn't run the ball enough), blamed him for the Owens turmoil (because he didn't donate his salary to the biggest cancer in the NFL) and essentially brushed aside the fact that his performance this year has been GREATLY influenced by the multiple injuries he has suffered.

Let me speak to this last point, first. Donovan McNabb has a HERNIA. A tear in the muscles lining your abdomen, and a big one. If you've never had one, you can't understand how much it hurts. It's unbearable. For this injury (let alone the bruised sternum and severe groin pull) to be shrugged off by the pundits is a mistake. Throwing a football or running at all SHOULD be impossible, but McNabb sucked it up, made no excuses and tried his best to play through it. Mondesire's inability to understand how much this injury affected McNabb's play is a testament to his lack of experience with pro sports, injuries and physical pain in general.

Next, let's address the claim that McNabb is selling out, because he is a black quarterback and isn't running the ball enough. Now, don't get me wrong, regardless of the injury, I wish McNabb would run the ball more. I do. I think there have been multiple times this year where I have thought that teams realized that he simply wasn't going to run, and therefore, have neglected to "spy" him (a term I'm sure Mondesire wouldn't understand. "Spying" is where you dedicate a linebacker or strong safety to the complete, isolated defense of the QB scramble/run on a given play). If McNabb ran the ball a few more time (again, assuming good health) I think it would do the Birds some good.

Having said that, I see no reason why McNabb is "selling out" because he has dedicated himself to the West Coast offense and to becoming a good pocket passer. McNabb isn't selling anyone out. He's doing his job. He'd be selling out his teammates if he ran simply because Mondesire told him it was the 'black' thing to do. In the offense he plays in, he must allow passing situations to develop. If he doesn't, and gets happy feet, and runs often, like Mondesire suggests, he will kill the West Coast offense that Reid has implemented. Don't forget that Mr. Happy Feet, Michael Vick, lost to McNabb in the NFC championship last year and the winner of the Super Bowl has been a pocket passer for a decade. Don't forget that McNabb had the best TD/INT ratio in the league (and for years) last year with 30 TDs and only 8 ints. He also ran for 220 yards and 3 touchdowns. He threw three bad passes in the Super Bowl (which led to a close loss) and no one recognizes that fact as much as I do. But his performance in the Super Bowl is unrelated to his recent lack of running ability.

Again, it's mostly to do with injury, offense, coaching, talent of his WRs and strategy. Donovan ran when he was younger because he struggled with reading defenses (as many young QBs do) and he had terrible receivers that couldn't get open (anyone remember Na Brown?). Last year, he had a good receiving corps, and therefore, needed to run less. He ran Reid's offense to perfection. It's a tough offense, and it requires precision. Last year they had that precision. They had all the necessary parts. This year he hasn't been healthy, he hasn't had TO, he hasn't had some of his O-line, he hasn't had Pinkston and as a result, he has struggled with the passing. If McNabb was having the same season he had last year, would his lack of running be an issue? NO! It's unfortunate that Mondesire is taking this cheap shot at a player who has already suffered enough and, in my mind, has done ONLY good things for the NFL, his teammates, his city and for the perception of professional athletes in general (of ANY race!). McNabb has been classy under fire, even when caught in the middle of some terrible media scrutiny. He has dealt with his own imperfections well and he will continue to improve. He has not lashed out, reacted with harsh words or been overtly negative to even his worst critics. McNabb is a class act, and young athletes of any race, in any sport, should take a page out of his book of decorum. (I'd simply advise them to avoid throwing the ball to Tedy Bruschi...)

Finally, Mondesire calls McNabb out for not donating his money to The Mouth (or, T.O. to the lay person). Are you kidding me? Somehow, it's McNabb's fault for being paid richly after becoming the most important Philly athlete since Dr. J? Gimme a break. T.O. signed a friggen' contract!! It paid him millions of dollars a year! It was a LONG TERM contract, worth about 8 million a year! And somehow, Mondesire is blaming McNabb for not shelling out more for a guy who has now proven, over and over, that all he cares about is himself? Good grief! Mondesire spins it as if it's McNabb's fault that TO held out and created a media circus... as if McNabb somehow opressed TO and forced him to act like a brat. This is too much. Listen, lots of guys get paid well. That has no bearing on whether their teammates should throw hissy fits. McNabb is completely free of responsibility, and for the amount of crap he's had to deal with, I'd say McNabb has earned every penny of his lifetime contract. It's not as if he put the Eagles in a position where they had no cap room... they have more cap room that 95% of the league!! McNabb is free of blame, in this regard. That issue is between the Eagles and T.O..

Mondesire may be right that McNabb is no Tom Brady (arguably the best pure winner in the NFL's recent history), and he hasn't won a Super Bowl like Doug Williams. But that is not really the issue, right? Is that your complaint, Mondesire? I hope not, because that would be pathetic.

Regardless, it's important to note that McNabb is far better than 'mediocre', as Mondesire describes him. Mark Brunell is mediocre. Kerry Collins is mediocre. Aaron Brooks is mediocre. McNabb is very, very good. One of the best. And when his team has recovered from this terrible turn of events/string of bad luck, he will be back. Throwing, winning, and when necessary, running. I promise.

It's easy to pick on a guy when his team is losing, when he's just been under the knife and when his teammates are injured or suspended. I look forward to Mondesire's thoughts when the Eagles are winning again.

Until then, this is what I think, take it or leave it.


(below you can see the article written by J. Whyatt Mondesire)

Hey McNabb!
Yo--Donny! I'm calling you man.
Hey, soup guy, over here!
Donovan E. McNabb, you hear me callin' you. Will you please pay attention?For a whole lot of years now, we've heard you crying aloud about being taken seriously as a black quarterback who can camp out in the pocket and deliver rifle shots across midfield right into the fingertips of the fleetest of wideouts and tight ends. Say, like a Doug Williams, the brilliant Grambling star quarterback of a generation ago who went on to break a Super Bowl record for touchdown passes in 1988.
Well....well...I've seen you Donovan E. McNabb--in your formative years as well as your mid-career development--and one thing is certain. Donovan E. McNabb you're no Doug Williams.

(The Grambling all-star completed 18 of 29 passes for 340 yards and four touchdowns, capping it off with 35 points in the fourth quarter alone. He followed that performance with three conference championships in 2000, '01 and '02.
Your record is another matter entirely. In fact this whole dismal season so far has really been a testament of fallen dreams and lost opportunities most of which belongs at your feet (or should I say hands) and that of your coach, Andy Reid who has allowed you to perpetuate a fraud on the field while hiding behind excuses dripping in make-believe racial stereotypes.
Normally this column talks very little about sports because the games that grown men play pale in comparison to the great issues of racism, politics, social calamities, health crisis's, war and peace, etc.; which gives us plenty of fertile territory to explore and pontificate about.
However, this week I felt compelled to offer some personal thoughts about your horrific on-field performances this season because at their core, there is a lie you have tried to use to hide the fact that in reality you actually are not that good. In essence Donny, you are mediocre at best. And trying to disguise that fact behind some concocted reasoning that African American quarterbacks who can scramble and who can run the ball are somehow lesser field generals than one who can summon up dead-on passes at a whim, is more insulting off the field than on.
Your athleticism and unpredictability to sometimes run with the ball earlier in your career not only confused defenses, it also thrilled Eagles fans. At last, said many of us, now we have a multifaceted offensive threat whose talents threaten to not just dominate the NFC East Division, but maybe the whole NFL for several years. We were elated. We were in awe.
We celebrated the boss's giving you that huge lifetime salary deal which meant we'd have you around until it was time for you to join the other retired stars in television's broadcast booth.
But then you played the race card and practically all of us fell for your hustle. You scammed us man and there's no way any longer to refrain from "keepin' it real."
We could have remained silent too, if you had found another way to remain effective and a winner. But when your mediocre talent becomes so apparent it's time to call it out.
Through the first four games, you completed 110 of 174 passes (63.2 percent) for a league-leading 1,333 yards and 11 touchdowns.
However, in your last five games, you connected on just 101 of 183 passes (55.2 percent) for 1,174 yards and five touchdowns, while throwing six interceptions, two of which clearly were game losers.
The sports hernia you suffered after the team's Week 3 win over Oakland clearly is a mega factor in the latter numbers.
But who can forget your mind numbing fourth-quarter collapse in last year's Super Bowl against New England.
Andy Reid may not have seen it. Owner Jeff Lurie may have missed it on the videotaped replay. But Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder "saw" it. You choked brother.
The brash and bombastic Terrell Owens may have committed the unpardonable sin of going public with his put down, but was he fundamentally wrong? The pressure, the hype, the clock--they all just converged and your nerve collapsed under their combined weight. Mediocre isn't horrible in and of itself. Most of us don't live up to our dreams. It's when we fake it that most of the rest of us get irritated.
So, for you to continue to deny we fans (as well as yourself) one of the strongest elements of your game by claiming that "everybody expects black quarterbacks to scramble" not only amounts to a breach of faith but also belittles the real struggles of black athletes who've had to overcome real racial stereotypcasting in addition to downright segregation.
College football in the South didn't drop its White Only wall until 1966 four years after James Meredith, while trying to enroll at Ole Miss, which went 10-0 that year, even as its practice field was covered federal troops who had bivouacked there.
Earlier this month Sports Illustrated reporting pioneering black players in the vaunted SEC had to endure serious hardships, such as "Fritz Pollard, the black all-America at Brown during World War I, (who) had learned to spin on his back and thrust his cleats in the air when tackled, to protect himself from late hits; how Iowa State's Jack Trice was trampled to death during a 1923 game against Minnesota; and how in 1951, on the first play from scrimmage, an Oklahoma A&M player broke the jaw of Drake running back Johnny Bright, forcing him to abandon football and causing the school to withdraw in protest from the Missouri Valley Conference."
Hey Donny, see any difference yet in your trumped up racial views and those pioneers?
Taken together, your pretty decent arm, strong desire to win, and your instinctive ability to scramble in the backfield gave you an awesome package. Take away any one of the legs from this tripod, and whole thing falls flat as you are right now as you recuperate from the surgery that was long overdue the day you entered the hospital.
Finally, your failure as a team leader off the field to my mind did as much as anything to exacerbate the debacle that has become synonymous with T.O.'s full name.
Professional football is really more about money that sport. The fans know it. The players signs contracts for it. And, of course the owners know it, since they are first and last ones to count it when the season ends.
Just think how the whole media circus could have been avoided had you had the courage to offer only a tiny fraction of your bonus this year to Owens and running back, Brian Westbrook.The gesture alone would have prompted these guys to run through walls for you. The rest of the team would have praised you. And what the heck were Lurie and team president Joe Banner going to do publicly if they objected or thought you had reach out-of-bounds. Fire you?
Yeah right. Let's really do "keep it real."
Leaders who make sacrifices are the stuff of legends. Who remembers a hoarder except for maybe Midas?
Hey Donny...soup guy! Pull your head out of your million-dollar Campbell's soup bowl for a moment ask which current quarterback in fact made a gesture like that for members of his squad.
Does the name Tom Brady ring a bell? Isn't he the guy who took home last year's Super Bowl ring while you standing in the soup line?

Monday, December 12, 2005

Sorry Folks!

We've had a few weeks of technical difficulties, but we're back online. I'm sure you assumed that I would pick all the NFL games right anyhow. Right? Let's recap the last 2 weeks. Reggie Bush won the Heisman... the Seahawks tripped backwards into another close win and then obliterated the soon to be 5-11 Eagles... the Miami Heat pretended that Stan Van Gundy needed to spend more time with his kids so that Pat Riley could take control of a team that is finally worth his time... Steve Spurrier ranked Notre Dame, like, 14th in the country in the coaches poll (14th!?!?!?!).... Two idiots gave Michael Robinson of Penn State their 1st place votes for the Heisman... the Duke Blue Devils maintained their #1 rank even despite a very close games against VT.... Bodhner's Dominators (my fantasy football team) moved into fifth place in the greatest fantasy football league ever.... the NHL continued its slide towards irrelevance and the Detroit Pistons continue to dominate the Eastern Conference in the NBA. It's been a good couple of weeks.

So, a couple recommendations. One, find a way to listen to Colin Cowherd on ESPN radio. He's pretty insightful, but mostly, he's just hilarious. That guy was born for sports talk radio. His show is on during my drive to work and I just can't get enough. He tells it like it is and keeps the laughs coming.

Also, if you're looking for great sports and social commentary coupled with contemporary humor, look no further than Bill Simmons or The Sports Guy at http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/simmons/index.

(send this blog to your friends by clicking the envelope below)

Monday, December 05, 2005

Great googely moogely, Reggie Bush is GOOD!!

You know what? If we took all the best Heisman candidates from the last 15 years and gave out an "Ultimate Heisman Trophy" (or something with a cooler name), Reggie Bush would win. He's not just the best college football player this year. He's the best, most exciting, most versatile player I've ever seen at the college level.

If USC is ever behind in a game, or in a tight spot, everyone knows they're calling Bush's number. And you know what? It doesn't matter. People have been trying to stop the guy all year long, with little success. He gets to, and turns the corner faster than anyone (dare I say, at ANY level). He is just as threatening as a receiver... and what's worse, he can run between the tackles with the best of them. At 6', 205 Bush is not the most bruising back, but his ability to keep defenders on their heals allows him to run them over whenever he needs to do so.

People have compared him to Gale Sayers, Barry Sanders, Brian Westbrook, Marshall Faulk and others, but the truth is, that's just not being fair to Bush. Not that I'm saying he'll be as successful a pro as any of those guys (I mean, I think he will, but who knows, anything can happen...), but I think to say he's in someone else's mold is unfair. He's a totally new RB and I look forward to watching him win in January this year and for years to come.

If you're interested, check out this link. It's Reggie Bush's high school highlight film and it's just sick. Sick, I tell you!! (string each line together for the proper URL...)

http://video.on.nytimes.com/ifr_main.jsp?nsid=b-6e1d86b3:107de615ee0:20f&st=1133457454511&amp
;amp;amp;amp;amp;mp=WMP&cpf=true&fr=120105_12
1650_w6e1d86b3x107e74dbc47xw777e&rdm=566054.6788326055

Saturday, December 03, 2005

Michael Irvin, Drugs and Youth Sports...

Those of us that believe that there is a "right way" to do things in the world of sports, won a big battle two weeks ago when Terrell Owens and his agent were quieted by the Eagles & the NFL. Coaches and parents all over America are now able to point to that incident and say, "Look what happens when you are a selfish, prima donna that could care less about your teammates... you lose everything, including respect."

Well, there is a new problem. Michael Irvin. He isn't so different that T.O. Michael Irvin was a great receiver in the 90's, he played on some of the best Cowboy teams of all time. His stats speak for themselves and he will probably end up in the Hall of Fame. That's the problem. Michael Irvin wasn't just a bad guy when he was in the NFL, he was abhorrent. He and some of his teammates participated in parties that would have made the Vikings Love Boat cruise seem totally innocent. The "White House" (in Dallas) and the things that happened there are no secret among those that know anything about the NFL. You name it, it happened. Hard drugs such as crack, cocaine, heroine; prostitution, adultery and allegedly, rape. Michael Irvin was the ring leader of these parties. He was a bad guy.

Somehow, today, he is up for his 2nd chance at the Hall of Fame. Last week, he was stopped because he had an upaid parking ticket, when a crack pipe and two bags with marijuana residue on them were found. The man hasn't changed. ESPN, who employs Michael Irvin as a commentator, needs to take the necessary steps to distance themselves from the him. Never should have hired Irvin in the first place. Just like the Eagles, ESPN should have known what they were getting themselves into. It is time for ESPN to distance themselves, as an organization, from criminals like Irvin. Stick with Tom Jackson, Steve Young and Chris Berman-types.

When young Americans grow up hearing about Michael Irvin's exploits in the "White House", and then see ESPN gladly hire him for ratings, they are getting the wrong message, which is, "Do what ever you want, as long as you win and bring in a few more ratings points." In Michael Irvin's case, it doesn't even make sense. His commentary is terrible and very biased towards players he has personal relationships with, like T.O.! ESPN needs to make a decision that is good for sports, not just for themselves. What, are people REALLY gonna stop watching ESPN if Irvin is gone? NO! It's the only worthwhile pregame show out there!

The NFL, too, has a decision to make. All the reps of the NFL and media who vote on the Hall of Fame need to take a strong look at Irvin's personal life. I know it has somehow become popular to try to sweep someone's personal life under the rug, but Irvin is an extreme case. Try as they might, no one can erase his past, especially if it keeps surfacing. Irvin shouldn't have been a first ballot Hall of Famer, and I hope against hope that he doesn't make it on this second ballot, either.

For Irvin's sake, I hope he can distance himself from these habits/addictions, but I don't think it is the responsibility of ESPN (a national media source that basically dictates what EVERYONE thinks about sports) and the NFL (the strongest league in the history of the world) to be Michael Irvin apologists (to steal a Dan Patrickism). It may seem harsh, but these decisions need to be made so that the future of sports, so that we can have more Warrick Dunn types (community service guru), more Roger Staubachs (an officer and a gentleman), more Pat Tillmans (a real American hero). More good guys!

That's what I think, take it or leave it.


(send this blog to your friends by clicking the envelope below)

Sunday, November 27, 2005

NFL PICKS

Every week, I'll be posting my picks for the NFL match-ups. Since the Turkey Day games have already taken place, I'll just leave out the obvious fact that I would have taken Denver and Atlanta.

Cincy over Baltimore: Chad Johnson may have gold teeth, but he and Carson Palmer are still unstoppable.

Carolina over Buffalo: Last week was a fluke. Carolina is a very good team with a very good defense.

KC over New England: New England has too many holes on D, and Mr. Larry Johnson will be sure to find them.

Chicago over Tampa: Steve Young was right and da' Bears ain't no laissez-faire defense. Take a look, they are awesome!

Minnesota over Cleveland: I've been saying it for years, Daunte Culpepper is over-rated. Brad Johnson is above average and that is all the Vikes need against a bad Browns squad.

San Diego over Washington: San Diego is very good. Don't be fooled by their record. Washington isn't very good and they won't be able to stop LT, Gates and Brees.

SF over Tennessee: Did the 49ers look good last week? Maybe so, but they won't have to look good this week to win.

Jax over Arizona: The Cards have a decent passing game, but that's it. Jacksonville is a strong team, all-around.

Oakland over Miami: The Raiders CAN'T be as bad as they have looked, can they? If they continue to struggle, the Kerry Collins experiment might be over.

Philly over GB: I love the Eagles, and I know it may seem like a stretch to pick them without McNabb, T.O., Tra Thomas, Lito Sheppard and Hank Fraley, but I'm doing it. The Packers aren't any good. Right?

Seattle over NYG: You can't stop Alexander. And you have to give much of the credit to his offensive line. Have you ever taken the time to just watch Walter Jones? What a total dominator!

NO over Jets: Today, it'll be about who sucks less. (aka, the Matt Leinart sweepstakes).

Indy over Pitt: The Colts are going undefeated. This is the most complete team I've seen since the Cowboys of the early 90's.


That's it folks, stay tuned till next week and feel free to write in and tell me why I'm wrong... :)